Bad SEO Information: Too Easy to Find, Impossible to Escape

Bad SEO Information: Too Easy to Find, Impossible to Escape

Why is SEO so hard to figure out? The short answer is because unless you’ve been in the industry for a long time, it’s really hard to discern good information, to bad information, to obsolete information. So the only way you really know is through experience what works and what doesn’t. Plus, some of the work is so intangible, that the value of the work is very subjective. This won’t change for a long time because the solution is more proper education, but that’s difficult when the industry changes so often.

Original Article:
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/bad-seo-information/198021/amp/

Read More
What You Need to Know About Duplicate GMB Listings

What You Need to Know About Duplicate GMB Listings

Something new to do in SEO: white hat, “negative SEO”. What’s the main problem with SEO? Lack of real estate on the 1st page of the search engine. So how can you help your small business client? By removing your client’s competitor’s black hat SEO techniques like multiple Google Maps listings.

Original Article:
https://moz.com/blog/duplicate-gmb-listings

Read More

Aaron Wall On SEO

I still enjoy reading the most sour guy in internet marketing, Aaron Wall. This is his summary on his home page of what you get from SEO hahahahaha:

WHAT YOU GET When you SEO
-Totally Arbitrary selective ex-post-facto enforcement of guidelines!
-LendUp’s doorway pages: still rank
-Monopolistic bundling.
-Justification for duplicity.
-Scrape-n-displace.
-Endless fearmongering.
-Wild algorithmic swings.
-Soul-crushing uncertainty.
-Responsive AMP Plus HTTPS … arbitrary complexity to increase the chunk size of competition & defund SEO.
-Ad-heavy search results driving organic listings below the fold.
-“what you want to do, is sort of break their spirits.” – Matt Cutts

Read More

Having Success In SEO

For anybody that wants to have success in SEO, you need to produce results when clients pay you. Seems obvious. But take the latest industry craze. Making sure a client’s info is correct on all directory listings. Yes, the search engines like it if your NAP (name, address, phone #) is consistent on all directories. Yes, there’s a consensus in the industry it’s good. Yes, it does take work to do it. So what’s my problem with it? Doing this work doesn’t cause clients to get more customers and make more money. People selling this work say: “it helps improve SEO rankings”. Well ok, that’s possible. But it doesn’t solve the SEO problem of lack of real estate on the 1st page. The fact that there’s maybe 5-8 spots for local businesses to pop up organically. It doesn’t solve the problem for how much competition there is to be in one of those 5-8 spots. And guess what, you’re going to have more than 5-8 SEO companies that know what they’re doing, doing the exact same directory work that everyone else is. The problem in the SEO industry is that people want to get paid for their time and work, but don’t want to be accountable for whether the client makes more money. Why do I care? Because it ruins the credibility of SEO. So much to the point where no one will want to pay for it because they’ve been burned by it too many times. People that do SEO need to be able to point to tangible results and if they can’t, they’re contributing to the problem. For years, some people have predicted the death of SEO. And I believe that we could reach a point where SEO dies. But it won’t be because it’s not possible for SEO to make people money. It would be because no clients want to risk losing their money because of bad experiences of paying someone to do work that’s worthless like working on directory listings.

Read More
Value of a #1 Google Ranking Down 37% in Two Years?

Value of a #1 Google Ranking Down 37% in Two Years?

Complicated question, but I think organic, SEO, click through rates are down because of the public’s growing acceptance of ads at the top of the search engine. For years, there was proof of some people skipping the ads and going straight to the organic section. But my theory is that with Google loading the top with so many ads and pushing organic so far below, that consumers would rather give the ads a shot than scroll down to find the organic section. Thus making it even harder to make money off SEO.

Original Article:
http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/04/26/google-ranking-click-through-rate

Read More
Survey Says: People Would Rather Watch TV Shows on Computers than TVs

Survey Says: People Would Rather Watch TV Shows on Computers than TVs

…And cord cutting has just reached the tipping point. For the first time, more people surveyed said they preferred watching shows on their computer than the TV 42% to 23%. Mobile is at 13% Wow.

Original Article:
https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Survey-Says-People-Would-Rather-Watch-TV-Shows-on-Computers-than-TVs/1015744

Read More
Available NOW: Similar Audiences for Search Campaigns [Data]

Available NOW: Similar Audiences for Search Campaigns [Data]

Target similar audiences for search ad campaigns. Well, it’s about time Google! I’ve been waiting for this for a few years now. It’ll be interesting to see the cpc difference in better targeted clicks.

Original Article:
http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/04/25/similar-audiences-for-search-campaigns

Read More

Burger King’s new ad forces Google Home to advertise the Whopper

Pretty funny story. The scramble has begun to figure out how to leverage internet connected devices in the home.

Original Article:
https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/12/15259400/burger-king-google-home-ad-wikipedia

Read More

What Are Native Ads? And Why I Think They Don’t Work

Read More

Better Branding With Banner Ads = More Customers

Read More